[This is a special post for Rene. a translation of the article published a few weeks ago]
The success is based on the passion. I
like to think so. After I've changed many jobs, I started to wonder
if the next job I will go will be for more money or more passion.
Meanwhile, the salary has grown nicely, but I was going home really
tensioned and nervous. I tried at that moment a little introspection
and at one point I came to the question
You can work one day
without being paid?
You have another reason to work than to
receive a payment?I guess you do not work for revenge or because you
are getting bored at home and you want to meet some cool guys.
Personally, I prefer to work on topics
that I’m passionate about. Of course,there are always other things
to do than ones that excites you most, but at least once a week I’m
working on something that brings me joy.
The last trends in human resource
management includes "engagement officers"(a kind of
officers responsible with the mood and motivation of employers),
methods and procedures of retention,benefits and compensation plans.
All based on two directions: Talent that you are born with. And
passion,that you need to arouse every day. Or, at least once or twice
a month.
And if the things you’re passionate
about you can not do them without payment, then it's even harder to
be motivated, to get over the frustrations inherent of any job, to
get up after a failure or to enjoy after a success. All matters
less,everything costs more.
Take a look at the photo below and think win what area do you think you are
Everything is relative,and for me it's
important to do for others what I would do for myself. The way that
passion is stimulated in a team depends of the manager, as well as
the team. People are different and they have a different way of being
motivated. Still, at the basis of everything is the fascinating,
essential topic of communication.
2 comentarii:
Salut,
Iti citesc blogul de ceva vreme, mai pe fuga, fain articolul.
Totusi mi se pare ca modelul prezentat este putin egoist, satisface nevoile eu-lui, exista o limita de "igiena" , dupa care eu-l este satisfacut si apar alte nevoi. Exista si alte nivele, care trebuiesc luate in considerare. Mai exact vorbesc despre asta:
http://www.ted.com/talks/david_logan_on_tribal_leadership.html
Multumesc pentru idee.
Nu incerc sa ofer modele atotcuprinzatoare, ci mai mult food for thought.
O sa incerc sa scriu, la un moment dat, despre ce te tine intr-un grup, organizatie, companie, mai departe de nevoile de baza descrise de Maslow.
Trimiteți un comentariu